On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:06 AM, Catalin Marinas
[off-list ref] wrote:

On 18 September 2012 13:47, Will Deacon [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 04:34:43PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:

quoted

+#define L_PTE2_SHARED                L_PTE_SHARED
+#define L_PTE2_READ          (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 6) /* HAP[0] */
+#define L_PTE2_WRITE         (_AT(pteval_t, 1) << 7) /* HAP[1] */

This is actually HAP[2:1], not HAP[1:0]. Also, can you follow what we do for
stage 1 translation and name these RDONLY and WRONLY (do you even use
that?).

We can't use RDONLY as this would have value 0 as the HAP attributes
(stage 2 overriding stage 1 translation attributes). Unless you add 4
definitions like NOACCESS, RDONLY, WRONLY and RDWR to cover all the
bit combinations.

quoted

quoted

+#define L_PTE2_NORM_WB               (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 4) /* MemAttr[3:2] */
+#define L_PTE2_INNER_WB              (_AT(pteval_t, 3) << 2) /* MemAttr[1:0] */

Another minor nit: PTE2 looks awful. Maybe L_PTE_HYP_* instead?

L_PTE_HYP may be confused with the Stage 1 Hyp translation which is
different from the guest Stage 2.

exactly, it's misleading, how about L_PTE_STAGE2, a little verbose,
but clear...?

But I have another minor nit - just write them in the ascending bit
order as other definitions in this file.

ok, will fix.

Thanks,
-Christoffer