* Tony Lindgren [off-list ref] [120917 15:54]:

* Mohammed, Afzal [off-list ref] [120917 01:40]:

quoted

Hi Tony,

On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:50:02, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:

quoted

* Mohammed, Afzal: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:20 PM

quoted

quoted

But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need
to get it right.

Reason has been identified. It was due to rounding error,
no changes are required in the expressions. Moving
completely to picoseconds resolves the issue.

Can you please try with the attached patch ?

Gave it a quick try and it seemed to work.. But when I tried
rebasing my patches for the cbus to keep things working with
the watchdog, I ran into multiple merge conflicts with
current linux next and gave up.

OK went back to my original branch without current linux
next and with the new cbus + retu driver from Aaro applied.
Confirmed it's now working on n800 tusb6010.
  

Care to repost this series updated against current linux
next?

I'm afraid I've pretty much lost track of all the patches
and rather not start resolving the conflicts as I'm sure
I'll break something else :)

You should still repost the whole updated series against
linux next.

Regards,

Tony