On 9/11/2012 10:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
quoted
On 9/11/2012 7:54 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
quoted
Just curious to know how you came with some of the above header names ?
plat/mcbsp ---> dsp-mcbsp.h
There is no connection of DSP with McBSP. "omap-mcbsp.h" would been a
better name.
This one was a mistake on my side, as Tony and Peter already pointed out.
How about asoc-mcbsp.h or asoc-omap-mcbsp.h?
After re-reading the cover-letter and your below response,
'asoc-omap-mcbsp.h' seems to be fine.
Note that mcbsp is also applicable to Davinci family of devices.
asoc-ti-mcbsp.h then?
DaVinci has a McBSP, but it is not the same as OMAP McBSP. The driver is
different (sound/soc/davinci/davinci-i2s.c vs sound/soc/omap/mcbsp.c)
and there as IP differences as well. It is better to keep the name as
asoc-omap-mcbsp.h for clarity.
Thanks,
Sekhar