On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 22:34:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:

quoted

On 9/11/2012 7:54 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:

quoted

Just curious to know how you came with some of the above header names ?

plat/mcbsp ---> dsp-mcbsp.h
There is no connection of DSP with McBSP. "omap-mcbsp.h" would been a
better name.

This one was a mistake on my side, as Tony and  Peter already pointed out.
How about asoc-mcbsp.h or asoc-omap-mcbsp.h?

After re-reading the cover-letter and your below response,
'asoc-omap-mcbsp.h' seems to be fine.

Note that mcbsp is also applicable to Davinci family of devices.

asoc-ti-mcbsp.h then?

Looks ok to me.

Thanks,
Vaibhav

	Arnd