Hi,
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 09:22:19PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
On 08/03/2012 04:38 PM, Sourav Poddar wrote:
quoted
Add I2C data node in omap5 device tree file.
quoted
Tested on omap5430 sdp.
quoted
Cc: Benoit Cousson <redacted>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <redacted>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <redacted>
Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
quoted
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
index 57e5270..6b68dfe 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5.dtsi
@@ -145,6 +145,41 @@
#interrupt-cells = <1>;
};
+ i2c1: i2c at 48070000 {
+ compatible = "ti,omap4-i2c";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ ti,hwmods = "i2c1";
Address postfix in the node name and no "reg" property?
that's because of the ti,hwmods attribute. OMAP is still not entirely
converted to DT and there's this weird ti,hwmods attribute. OMAP's hwmod
framework will fill up register addresses, irqs, etc when the device is
created. Oh well...
--
balbi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120806/56e58e13/attachment.sig>