Thid patch series adds device tree data to AM335x-EVM file and
adds pinmux settings required to configure two of the AM335x EVM
pins to D_CAN TX/RX pins.
Changes from v1:
- These two patches separated from c_can DT support
patch series.
AnilKumar Ch (2):
arm/dts: AM33XX: Add D_CAN device tree data
arm/dts: AM33XX: Configure pinmuxs for D_CAN1 on AM335x-EVM
arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evm.dts | 13 +++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
--
1.7.9.5
Add Bosch D_CAN controller device tree data to AM33XX dtsi file
by adding d_can device node with all the necessary parameters.
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Address postfix in the node name and no "reg" property?
This still works due to the hwmod mappings OMAP relies on. I would still
put it there, so the switch to real DT definitions will be less painful.
Daniel
Op 25 jul. 2012, om 14:23 heeft AnilKumar Ch [off-list ref] het volgende geschreven:
quoted hunk
Add Bosch D_CAN controller device tree data to AM33XX dtsi file
by adding d_can device node with all the necessary parameters.
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
I scanned the linux-networking mailinglist and l-o-ml, but I can't find the patchset that actually adds the d_can drivers, could you provide a link to that? I have 2 different CAN capes I'd like to test on beaglebone.
regards,
Koen
Add Bosch D_CAN controller device tree data to AM33XX dtsi file
by adding d_can device node with all the necessary parameters.
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Vaibhav,
Thanks for the review.
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:58:41, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
On 7/25/2012 5:53 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
quoted
Add Bosch D_CAN controller device tree data to AM33XX dtsi file
by adding d_can device node with all the necessary parameters.
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch <redacted>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Anil,
Any reason why we are only specifying dcan1 instance? Shouldn't we
specify dcan0 as well here?
Yes, I agree dcan0 needs to add because SoC support two instances. I
have added d_can1 only because on AM335x-EVM d_can1 is available and
in other case AM335x-bone have two instances available. I will send next
version of these patches.
Regards
AnilKumar