[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500'

[PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 1/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 2/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v2] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, no matching driver name for, 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 6/6] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP driver · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 6/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 2/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-03
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-04
RE: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Ola Lilja <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-08-10
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31

From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-31 16:48:25
Also in: alsa-devel, lkml

Hello.

On 07/31/2012 05:31 PM, Lee Jones wrote:

  Subject doesn't parse for me...

The platform attempts to register platform device 'snd_soc_u8500'
which doesn't actually exist. Here we change the reference to the
correct one 'snd_soc_mop500'.

Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>

WBR, Sergei

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help