[PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs

[PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 1/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 2/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Sergei Shtylyov <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 3/6 v2] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, no matching driver name for, 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 6/6] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP driver · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 6/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 5/6] ARM: ux500: Enable HIGHMEM on all mop500 platforms · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
[PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, so such struct 'snd_soc_u8500' · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: ux500: Remove unused snowball_of_platform_devs struct · Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 2/6] ASoC: ab8500: Inform SoC Core that we have our own I/O arrangements · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
[PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-01
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-03
Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-04
RE: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Ola Lilja <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Linus Walleij <hidden> · 2012-08-10
Re: [PATCH 1/6] ASoC: dapm: If one widget fails, do not force all subsequent widgets to fail too · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-08-02
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Mark Brown <hidden> · 2012-07-31
Re: [PATCH 1/6] Bugfixes and clean-ups bound for the v3.6 RCs · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2012-07-31

From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-31 14:31:00
Also in: alsa-devel, lkml

On 31/07/12 14:40, Mark Brown wrote:

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:31:21PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

This patch-set includes some important changes which should make
their way to the Mainline Release Candidates for the v3.6 release.

You appear to have double sent this or something...

I know *embarrassed smiley*.

I didn't clear out my patches directory before re-sending.

I'll re-send this patch-set, less the HIGHMEM patch.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help