[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c

[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-09
[PATCH 2/2 V2] MXS: Implement DMA support into mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-09
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-10
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · Shawn Guo <hidden> · 2012-06-11
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-11
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · Shawn Guo <hidden> · 2012-06-11
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-23
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · Shawn Guo <hidden> · 2012-06-11
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-11
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-27
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · Shawn Guo <hidden> · 2012-06-27
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-27
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-23
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · Shawn Guo <hidden> · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-25
[PATCH 1/2 V3] MXS: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c · marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut) · 2012-06-27

STALE5116d

From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2012-06-25 15:43:56
Also in: linux-i2c

On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 08:47:32PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:

Dear Shawn Guo,

quoted

This patch configures the I2C bus timing registers according
to information passed via DT. Currently, 100kHz and 400kHz
modes are supported.

[...]

Is there any reason why this can not be merged other than the timing registers 
goo (which I believe shall stay as in the datasheet until we figure out if it's 
even reasonable to add some computation there).

I assume this is a question for Wolfram.  But I guess part of the reason
is there is still one comment from me staying unresolved.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help