On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:02:27AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

quoted

Shouldn't this be (av8500->irq_base == NO_IRQ) now that we're tranisitioning to
use 0 as NO_IRQ?

No it shouldn't. ?We want new drivers to be rejecting on explicitly zero
IRQ numbers and not using NO_IRQ at all. ?We want to get rid of NO_IRQ
entirely.

Yes of course, it's strange how I can go astray sometimes ..
(!av8500->irq_base) it is.

Thanks Russell,
Linus Walleij