On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:44:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:39:06PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

quoted

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:35:33AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:

quoted

quoted

It's based on your for-next. But for working, it depends on
pinctl/for-next.

quoted

Mark, may I have your ack to have it go through arm-soc?  I will ask
Arnd pull your sound/for-v3.5 branch into arm-soc as a dependency.
You need to ensure the branch will not be rebased.

for-3.5 is the entire undifferentiated blob of ASoC stuff, it's not
really suitable for merging elsewhere.  It won't actually get rebased
but the idea of merging it into other trees doesn't seem terribly
clever, it'd make having topic branches in arm-soc a bit of a joke and
if you pull it right now you'll get problems in -next due to the the
ux500 stuff.

What does "working" mean in this context - what happens without the
pinctl changes?

devm_pinctrl_get_select_default function is added in below commit which
is in pinctrl/for-next.

commit 6d4ca1fb467932773da7b808c52f3d7ef4461ba0
Author: Stephen Warren [off-list ref]
Date:   Mon Apr 16 10:51:00 2012 -0600

    pinctrl: implement devm_pinctrl_get()/put()
    
    These functions allow the driver core to automatically clean up any
    allocations made by drivers, thus leading to simplified drivers.
    
    Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren [off-list ref]
    Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij [off-list ref]


So it'll fail compile without pinctrl/for-next. I guess Linus may need
to prepare a non-rebase base for others to merge.

Thanks
Richard