Thread (63 messages) 63 messages, 9 authors, 2012-05-14

[PATCH 02/13] ARM: OMAP5: Add minimal support for OMAP5430 SOC

STALE5258d

From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2012-05-07 17:33:51
Also in: linux-omap

* R, Sricharan [off-list ref] [120506 00:40]:
quoted
Also, please change the whole series to use CONFIG_SOC_OMAP5 instead
of CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP5. CONFIG_ARCH_OMAPXXXX stuff will go away except
for CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS. Sorry forgot to mention that earlier.
 ok. sure. will change this.
Thanks.
 
quoted
quoted
-#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4) && !(defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || ? ?\
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3))
+#if (defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP5) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4)) && \
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? !(defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3))
+
?static inline u32 omap2_prm_read_mod_reg(s16 module, u16 idx)
?{
? ? ? WARN(1, "prm: omap2xxx/omap3xxx specific function and "
Maybe these functions could be just set up as __weak to avoid the
ifdeffery?
 sorry to understand,
 you mean make this weak and have a strong override for OMAP2 ?
Yeah that should do the trick, right?
 
Regards,

Tony
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help