On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 02:50:02PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:

Shouldn't we add the pinctrl states in dts file at the same time
with this patch series or using another separate patch to add them
before this series to avoid breaking the exist mx6q platforms?

Ah, I just noticed that your patch "ARM: imx: enable pinctrl dummy
states" did not cover imx6q.  I think we should do the same for imx6q,
so that we can separate dts update from the driver change.  When all
imx6q boards' dts files get updated to have pins defined for the
devices, we can then remove dummy state for imx6q.  Doing so will ease
the pinctrl migration for those imx6q boards.

Will update your patch on my branch to have dummy state enabled for
imx6q.

quoted

  net: fec: adopt pinctrl support
  can: flexcan: adopt pinctrl support

This two also depends on another patch you sent.
[PATCH RESEND 1/9] ARM: mxs: enable pinctrl dummy states
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg173341.html

Maybe you can put this two in the mxs convert series to avoid breaking
mxs platforms.
[PATCH 0/9] Enable pinctrl support for mach-mxs
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg173312.html

Right.  I'm going to merge these two series into one since there are
device drives shared between imx and mxs.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn