On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 03:44:03PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:

On 20120502-15:41, Mike Turquette wrote:

quoted

On 20120502-17:26, Viresh Kumar wrote:

quoted

On 5/2/2012 3:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:

quoted

This needs a fixup. The clock framework used to pass in a NULL pointer
as prate when a clk is not allowed to change a parents clock. This
is no longer true, so we have to check for

__clk_get_flags(hw->clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT

Sure. Will send fixup.

@Mike: When will you send your clk patches to Arnd?
I am asking this, because SPEAr patches are dependent on
them. Also, please include this patch too, in your patchset.

I will send a fixup.

I will take this patch in before sending my request to Arnd.  In your
patch 0/8 you ask me to take in the series, but it looks like not all of
the patches are going through me.  For instance patch 2/8 certainly
looks destined for Russell.

Typo above.

s/patch 2/patch 1/

I've just pushed the latest version out for linux-next, and pulled it
across into the nightly build system.  The results should be up in a
couple of hours (and an hour more for the boot tests, not that it should
affect those.)