[PATCH v2 2/2] regulator: Add support for MAX77686.
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2012-05-20 10:00:21
Also in:
linux-samsung-soc, lkml
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 07:09:27PM +0530, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: Looks mostly good. A couple of fairly small things:
+static int max77686_get_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
+{This looks like it should be regulator_get_voltage_sel_regmap().
+static int max77686_set_voltage_sel(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+ unsigned sel)
+{This looks like it should be regulator_set_voltage_sel_regmap().
+ max77686->ramp_delay = pdata->ramp_delay - 1; + max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK2CTRL1, + RAMP_VALUE, RAMP_MASK); + max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK3CTRL1, + RAMP_VALUE, RAMP_MASK); + max77686_update_reg(i2c, MAX77686_REG_BUCK4CTRL1, + RAMP_VALUE, RAMP_MASK);
This code is unclear because RAMP_VALUE looks like a constant that has nothing to do with ramp_delay when in fact it's actually this:
+#define RAMP_VALUE (max77686->ramp_delay << 6)
which isn't constant - this is why I queried this last time. Just remove the define and write this out directly. The way the code is written@the minute it looks like ramp_delay is just stored and not referred to unless you go searching around the rest of the driver. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120520/bb6500c2/attachment.sig>