Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 6 authors, 2012-03-17
STALE5205d
Revisions (3)
  1. v1 current
  2. v1 [diff vs current]
  3. v1 [diff vs current]

[PATCH 0/5] MMC: mmci: Provide bindings for Device Tree

From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: 2012-03-15 15:32:44
Also in: linux-mmc

On Thursday 15 March 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
quoted
I would like to see what the minimal required change is to support DT
for mmci without factorization.
1. Minimal change in mmci.
2. Add mmci_dt.c which contains the DT-populate code.

The factorization could be done as step 2 I think.

What do you say?
I'm wondering what the difference is as the work has already been done.

It was Arnd's suggestion to separate out the two types of variants, and
I'm quite fond of the new (fully featured) layout.
Right, I usually prefer cleanups or other refactoring to be done first, and
then features added on top.

You could in theory add have just patches 3/4/5 all applied without
the refactoring, but that I would be worried that this causes dependencies
between the mmci driver and ux500 specific functionality like the
stedma40_filter function.

	Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help