[PATCH v3 00/13] gpio/omap: Some more driver cleanup and fixes
From: DebBarma, Tarun Kanti <hidden>
Date: 2012-03-12 20:27:03
Also in:
linux-omap
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:38 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 1:23 AM, DebBarma, Tarun Kanti [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Hilman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Tarun Kanti DebBarma [off-list ref] writes:quoted
The cleanup is mostly getting rid of redundant fields in struct gpio_bank{} as we already have them as part of bank->context now. Also, remove un-used variable from gpio_irq_handler. The fixes include correction of _set_gpio_irqenable() implementation, missing wakeup_en register update in set_gpio_wakeup(), type mismatch of gpio trigger parameter in set_gpio_trigger(), incorrect dataout register update in set_gpio_dataout_() and few corrections in context save logic. It is baselined on top of Kevin's following series: gpio/omap: cleanup and runtime PM conversion for v3.4 git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git for_3.4/gpio/runtime-pm-cleanup Series is available here for reference: git://gitorious.org/~tarunkanti/omap-sw-develoment/tarunkantis-linux-omap-dev for_3.4/gpio_further_cleanup_fixesThis branch doesn't exist.Oops... I am sorry. I was in the process of updating the branch with latest comments after base-lining on Grant's: git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git Branch: gpio/next Because this has all the gpio changes including Benoit's latest gpio devicetree changes. Should I go ahead?Anyways, for the time being I am updating on top of your changes as before. You should be able to see the branch shortly.
Please note that the branch has your following patch: gpio/omap: fix wakeups on level-triggered GPIOs -- Tarun
quoted
quoted
Kevin