On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 13:50 Wed 07 Mar , Nicolas Pitre wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
quoted
On 17:30 Tue 06 Mar , Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
This allows the user to use U-Boot's mkimage's -T kernel_noload option
if their arch Kconfig allows it, and they desire.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
---
The next patch enables this new CONFIG_ALLOW_ option for ARM. I assume
that some other architectures will also be able to enable it, but I'm
not familiar enough with any to know which.
I'm going to repeat. I don't think any impromevent here.
You know what? I agree with you... on a conceptual level only though.
In reality, some people are are just too used to it, either for
emotional reasons or simply because that's what was there before so they
simply perpetuated it without thinking further, or whatever. REmoving
that support would just upset a lot of people. And frankly we have
better things to do than starting a flamewar over this.
My concern is this new feature is available on new version of U-Boot only
and people that does not have it and built the uImage are going to ask the
question. Why bla bla bla....
Where people are supposed to RTFM
I do do not want to have the answer this and manage this.
Well, just don't then.
Nicolas