On Thursday 09 February 2012, Kukjin Kim wrote:

Will Deacon wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:50:23AM +0000, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Kyungmin Park [off-list ref]

wrote:

quoted

quoted

As I remember only DT based board file is acceptable for mainline?

For a new SoC family like 5250 it would be much preferred to only add
device-tree enabled boards.

As I commented, I'd like to support both dt and non-dt for EXYNOS5250 and
I'm saying EXYNOS5250 DT patches will be submitted next time again.

I think it would be much better to start with just the DT based platform
for exynos5 and leave out the atag based platform.

	Arnd