On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 08:13:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

Hi,

On Monday, December 12, 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote:

quoted

A device node pointer is added to generic pm domain structure to associate
the domain with a node in the device tree.

That sounds fine except for one thing: PM domains are not devices, so adding
"device node" pointers to them is kind of confusing.  Perhaps there should be
something like struct dt_node, representing a more general device tree node?

struct device_node has nothing to do with struct device.  device_node is a
generic device tree node.  Thomas' approach is fine.

g.