On Monday, December 26, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:

On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 08:13:19PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

quoted

On Monday, December 12, 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote:

quoted

quoted

A device node pointer is added to generic pm domain structure to associate
the domain with a node in the device tree.

quoted

That sounds fine except for one thing: PM domains are not devices, so adding
"device node" pointers to them is kind of confusing.  Perhaps there should be
something like struct dt_node, representing a more general device tree node?

There's struct of_node which is exactly that, though practically
speaking you need a device if you're going to bind automatically to
something from the device tree in a sensible fashion and there is actual
hardware under there so a device does make some sense.

This is in part compatibility with the existing Exynos code which uses
devices to probe the domains for non-DT systems.

Well, that's not a general case, though.

It doesn't feel approporiate to use a "device node" pointer for something
that's not based on struct device, at least not a generic level, so I wonder
if there's a different way.

Thanks,
Rafael