[PATCH v3 2/4] ARM: pxa168: Add SDHCI support

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Philip Rakity [off-list ref] wrote:

Haojian,

Should the APMU definitions be moved to a separate include for pxa168 and say given the name pxa168_apmu.h ?

Same comment applies to all the register set since they are not really common.

Philip

I think it's unnecessary to create a new apmu.h. We can distinguish
them by name in macro, as PXA168/MMP2.

Thanks
Haojian