On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 03:01:19PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:05:04PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 09:26:24PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:

quoted

Hi Dave,

Sorry for that I did not look into previous post to point it out.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:39:41AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:

quoted

The i.MX6 Quad SoC will work without the l2x0 L2 cache controller
support built into the kernel, so this patch removes the dependency
on CACHE_L2X0 and selects MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 instead.

This makes the l2x0 support optional, so that it can be turned off
when desired for debugging purposes etc.

Thanks to Shawn Guo for this suggestion. [1]

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <redacted>

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074602.html
---
 arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
index 29a3d61..1fb93f2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig

@@ -609,13 +609,13 @@ comment "i.MX6 family:"
 config SOC_IMX6Q
 	bool "i.MX6 Quad support"
 	select ARM_GIC
-	select CACHE_L2X0
 	select CPU_V7
 	select HAVE_ARM_SCU
 	select HAVE_IMX_GPC
 	select HAVE_IMX_MMDC
 	select HAVE_IMX_SRC
 	select HAVE_SMP
+	select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0

The option SOC_IMX6Q is only available when ARCH_IMX_V6_V7 is selected.
Since MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 has been selected by ARCH_IMX_V6_V7 in
patch #1, this line seems redundant here.

Would it be better keep this one and remove patch #1 one? imx5 doesn't have
l2x0.

Do you mean to remove MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 from ARCH_IMX_V6_V7, and select
it only from SOC_IMX6Q?

Yes, I think it's more precise. Shawn?

Thansk
Richard

Cheers
---Dave

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel