Thread (25 messages) 25 messages, 8 authors, 2011-12-16
STALE5304d

[PATCH v4 REPOST 3/5] omap4: Unconditionally require l2x0 L2 cache controller support

From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2011-12-14 18:14:25
Also in: linux-omap, linux-samsung-soc, linux-sh, linux-tegra

* Dave Martin [off-list ref] [111214 03:08]:
If running in the Normal World on a TrustZone-enabled SoC, Linux
does not have complete control over the L2 cache controller
configuration.  The kernel cannot work reliably on such platforms
without the l2x0 cache support code built in.
There are HS and GP omaps (High Security and General Purpose).
GP omaps do have full control of the L2. Also HS omaps most likely
provide control over enabling and disabling L2 depending how the
secure code is implemented.

BTW, the real problem is that because the secure code is implemented
in various ways, we don't really have any handling for it in Linux.

The SMI instruction numbers don't seem to be standardized at all,
and can mean different things on different boards, even different
board versions :(

Sounds like devicetree is the only safe way to deal with the L2
control options.

Regards,

Tony

 
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch unconditionally enables l2x0 support for the OMAP4 SoCs.

Thanks to Rob Herring for this suggestion. [1]

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <redacted>

[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2011-November/074495.html
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
index bb1b670..94e568a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig
@@ -41,11 +41,11 @@ config ARCH_OMAP4
 	bool "TI OMAP4"
 	default y
 	depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
+	select CACHE_L2X0
 	select CPU_V7
 	select ARM_GIC
 	select HAVE_SMP
 	select LOCAL_TIMERS if SMP
-	select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0
 	select PL310_ERRATA_588369
 	select PL310_ERRATA_727915
 	select ARM_ERRATA_720789
-- 
1.7.4.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help