Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 2 authors, 2011-12-04

[PATCH 2a/5] Remove unsafe clock values from omap1_defconfig

From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
Date: 2011-12-01 19:05:00
Also in: linux-omap, lkml
Subsystem: arm port, omap clock framework support, omap1 support, the rest · Maintainers: Russell King, Paul Walmsley, Aaro Koskinen, Janusz Krzysztofik, Linus Torvalds

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

* Janusz Krzysztofik [off-list ref] [111201 10:04]:
On Thursday 01 of December 2011 at 18:17:58, Tony Lindgren wrote:
quoted
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ int __init omap1_clk_init(void)
 
 void __init omap1_clk_late_init(void)
 {
-	if (ck_dpll1.rate >= OMAP1_DPLL1_SANE_VALUE)
+	if (ck_dpll1.rate > OMAP1_DPLL1_SANE_VALUE)
 		return;
 
 	/* Find the highest supported frequency and enable it */
This change really makes sense to me, however, knowing the initial 
(bootloader selected) clock rate my board boots at, which is 
unfortunately raw 12 MHz, I would be surprised if that helped.
OK, that's not it then. BTW, we should be able to drop that test once
we have your patches applied.
 
Before e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408, 
omap1_select_table_rate() was returning the rate selected with .config 
because it was called early, with ck_dpll1_p->rate uninitialized. Now it 
is not, and returns nothing, resulting in 60 MHz default. Then, the only 
way I can see to correct the problem is something like patch 3/5, which 
you are justifiably affraid of of always switching to 216 MHz with 
omap1_defconfig.
Ah, you got it! That's what causes the regression. How about the following
fix for the -rc cycle then?

Tony


From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 11:00:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP1: Fix reprogramming of DPLL1 for systems that boot at rates below 60MHz

Commit e9b7086b80c4d9e354f4edc9e280ae85a60df408 (ARM: OMAP: Fix
reprogramming of dpll1 rate) fixed a regression for systems that
did not rely on bootloader set rates.

However, it also introduced a new problem where the rates selected
in .config would not take affect as omap1_select_table_rate
currently refuses to reprogram DPLL1 if it's already initialized.

This was not a problem earlier, as the reprogramming was done
earlier with ck_dpll1_p->rate uninitialized.

Fix this by forcing the reprogramming on systems booting at rates
below 60MHz. Note that the long term fix is to make the rates
SoC specific later on.

Thanks for Janusz Krzysztofik [off-list ref] for figuring
this one out.

Reported-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
index 1297bb5..3f30561 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
@@ -930,6 +930,9 @@ void __init omap1_clk_late_init(void)
 	if (ck_dpll1.rate >= OMAP1_DPLL1_SANE_VALUE)
 		return;
 
+	/* System booting at unusable rate, force reprogramming of DPLL1 */
+	ck_dpll1_p->rate = 0;
+
 	/* Find the highest supported frequency and enable it */
 	if (omap1_select_table_rate(&virtual_ck_mpu, ~0)) {
 		pr_err("System frequencies not set, using default. Check your config.\n");
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help