On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Mark Brown
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 02:18:24PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:01:52PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

quoted

No, the fixed voltage regultor is a superset of a general regulator - it
has additional information like the voltage it supplies and the optional
enable GPIO.

quoted

Still, seems like it could be merged into one regulator binding.

I don't see how you can usefully do that, the task of plumbing a
regulator into a board is largely orthogonal to the specific feature set
of a given regulator. ?The specific bindings for a fixed voltage
regulator would be useful or unhelpful for most regultors controlled via
I2C.

I meant more that the fixed regulators should reuse as much as
possible from the generic regulator bindings, instead of completely
forking them.

Then, depending on how they are controlled, there will be more
specific bindings. So the case of a gpio-controlled fixed regulator
would have a binding where the format of the properties to find the
gpio, etc, would be described. But things like voltage (without a
range, obviously) would be using the same bindings as the other
regulators.

Does that make more sense?


-Olof