[PATCH v3 2/4] regulator: adapt fixed regulator driver to dt
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-04 21:01:55
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml
From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-04 21:01:55
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:22PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
Shouldn't a fixed regulator just be a subset of a fixed one? If so, should the binding be merged with that one?
No, the fixed voltage regultor is a superset of a general regulator - it has additional information like the voltage it supplies and the optional enable GPIO.
quoted
+- regulator-fixed-enabled-at-boot: 1 = yes, 0 = no
Same here, you can drop the prefix. Also, the regular regulators use "regulator-name" for the supply name, it would make sense to reuse the same naming here, right?
I'm having a hard time associating your second comment with the property being discussed - could you clarify please?