Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, 2011-11-07

[PATCH v3 2/4] regulator: adapt fixed regulator driver to dt

From: Mark Brown <hidden>
Date: 2011-11-04 21:01:55
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-omap, lkml

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:22PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
Shouldn't a fixed regulator just be a subset of a fixed one? If so, should the
binding be merged with that one?
No, the fixed voltage regultor is a superset of a general regulator - it
has additional information like the voltage it supplies and the optional
enable GPIO.
quoted
+- regulator-fixed-enabled-at-boot: 1 = yes, 0 = no
Same here, you can drop the prefix. Also, the regular regulators use
"regulator-name" for the supply name, it would make sense to reuse the same
naming here, right?
I'm having a hard time associating your second comment with the property
being discussed - could you clarify please?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help