[PATCH 2/6] drivers/base: add bus for System-on-Chip devices
From: gregkh@suse.de (Greg KH)
Date: 2011-10-17 16:19:14
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:52:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
Traditionally, any System-on-Chip based platform creates a flat list of platform_devices directly under /sys/devices/platform. In order to give these some better structure, this introduces a new bus type for soc_devices that are registered with the new soc_device_register() function. All devices that are on the same chip should then be registered as child devices of the soc device. The soc bus also exports a few standardised device attributes which allow user space to query the specific type of soc. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <redacted>
The code is much better, and smaller, but there's still some issues with it:
+static ssize_t soc_info_get(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf);
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(machine, S_IRUGO, soc_info_get, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(family, S_IRUGO, soc_info_get, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(soc_id, S_IRUGO, soc_info_get, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(revision, S_IRUGO, soc_info_get, NULL);
+
+static ssize_t soc_info_get(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ struct soc_device *soc_dev =
+ container_of(dev, struct soc_device, dev);
+
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_machine)
+ return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", soc_dev->attr->machine);
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_family)
+ return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", soc_dev->attr->family);
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_revision)
+ return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", soc_dev->attr->revision);
+ if (attr == &dev_attr_soc_id)
+ return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", soc_dev->attr->soc_id);
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+}If you move around things a bit here, you can save 4 lines of code, please do so.
+
+struct bus_type soc_bus_type = {
+ .name = "soc",
+};
+
+static int __init soc_bus_register(void)
+{
+ return bus_register(&soc_bus_type);
+}
+core_initcall(soc_bus_register);No unregister?
+struct attribute *soc_attr[] = {
+ &dev_attr_machine.attr,
+ &dev_attr_family.attr,
+ &dev_attr_soc_id.attr,
+ &dev_attr_revision.attr,
+ NULL,
+};
+
+struct attribute_group soc_attr_group = {
+ .attrs = soc_attr,
+};
+
+struct device *soc_device_register(struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr)
+{
+ struct soc_device *soc_dev;
+ static atomic_t soc_device_num = ATOMIC_INIT(0);No, please don't do this, use the proper kernel interface to dynamically handle numbering devices (hint, if you unload a SOC device, you will never reclaim that device number, which isn't that nice.)
+struct soc_device_attribute {
+ const char *machine;
+ const char *family;
+ const char *revision;
+ const char *soc_id;
+};What happens if one of these attributes is NULL? Please check for that when you create the attributes so that you don't create an attribute you don't want to.
+
+struct soc_device {
+ struct device dev;
+ struct soc_device_attribute *attr;
+};Why is this needed to be defined here? It should be in the .c file as no external code needs to know what it looks like. thanks, greg k-h