On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:19:37PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Tuesday 27 September 2011 05:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 03:42:51PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
quoted
quoted
+ if (!dev)
+ return NULL;
quoted
So how do we handle CPUs? cpufreq is one of the most active users of
regulators...
Hmm, never thought of it :(
Maybe I should associate a supply name with all
regulators and then lookup from the global registered
list.
I'm not sure how this should work in a device tree world, I'd *hope*
we'd get a device tree node for the CPU and could then just make this a
regular consumer thing but then the cpufreq drivers would need to be
updated to make use of it. The only reason we allow null devices right
now is the fact that cpufreq doesn't have a struct device it can use.
quoted
quoted
+ snprintf(prop_name, 32, "%s-supply", supply);
+
+ prop = of_get_property(dev->of_node, prop_name,&sz);
+ if (!prop || sz< 4)
+ return NULL;
quoted
sz< 4? Magic! :)
Its the valid phandle size.
I guess I need a sz != 4
I think we need an of_get_phandle(), it'd be clearer what the check is,
more type safe and would avoid needing to replicate the check.