Hello,

On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:29:51AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

On Thursday 30 June 2011 18:12:27 Huang Shijie-B32955 wrote:

quoted

I think gpmi-nfc is much better then gpmi-nand or gpmi-flash.

Then how do you want to name the near field communication drivers?

I'm not aware that the i.MX23/28 has support for near field
communication, still the i.MX28 Reference speaks about "GPMI NAND Mode".
I couldn't find "NFC" in the document. So I vote for gpmi-nand, too.
(IMHO gpmi-flash is too generic.)

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |