Hello,

On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 08:37:06PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:

I think a better way to solve this problem is to have a
clk_set_rate_range() and hence suggesting it. This would also help
reduce the no. of lines/data passed in board files which I think
helps clean up ARM code.

Just an implementation detail: clk_round_rate_range would be enough.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |