[PATCH v5 15/19] ARM: LPAE: Add support for cpu_v7_do_(suspend|resume)
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: 2011-05-20 13:21:15
Also in:
lkml
Tony, On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 08:27 +0100, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Catalin Marinas [off-list ref] [110508 15:52]:quoted
--- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S@@ -260,19 +260,32 @@ cpu_v7_name: /* Suspend/resume support: derived from arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/sleep.S */ .globl cpu_v7_suspend_size +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE +.equ cpu_v7_suspend_size, 4 * 10 +#else .equ cpu_v7_suspend_size, 4 * 8 +#endif #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP ENTRY(cpu_v7_do_suspend) stmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, lr} mrc p15, 0, r4, c13, c0, 0 @ FCSE/PID mrc p15, 0, r5, c13, c0, 1 @ Context ID mrc p15, 0, r6, c3, c0, 0 @ Domain ID +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE + mrrc p15, 0, r7, r8, c2 @ TTB 0 + mrrc p15, 1, r2, r3, c2 @ TTB 1 +#else mrc p15, 0, r7, c2, c0, 0 @ TTB 0 mrc p15, 0, r8, c2, c0, 1 @ TTB 1 +#endif mrc p15, 0, r9, c1, c0, 0 @ Control register mrc p15, 0, r10, c1, c0, 1 @ Auxiliary control register mrc p15, 0, r11, c1, c0, 2 @ Co-processor access control +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE + stmia r0, {r2 - r11} +#else stmia r0, {r4 - r11} +#endif ldmfd sp!, {r4 - r11, pc} ENDPROC(cpu_v7_do_suspend)@@ -280,12 +293,21 @@ ENTRY(cpu_v7_do_resume) mov ip, #0 mcr p15, 0, ip, c8, c7, 0 @ invalidate TLBs mcr p15, 0, ip, c7, c5, 0 @ invalidate I cache +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE + ldmia r0, {r2 - r11} +#else ldmia r0, {r4 - r11} +#endif mcr p15, 0, r4, c13, c0, 0 @ FCSE/PID mcr p15, 0, r5, c13, c0, 1 @ Context ID mcr p15, 0, r6, c3, c0, 0 @ Domain ID +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE + mcrr p15, 0, r7, r8, c2 @ TTB 0 + mcrr p15, 1, r2, r3, c2 @ TTB 1 +#else mcr p15, 0, r7, c2, c0, 0 @ TTB 0 mcr p15, 0, r8, c2, c0, 1 @ TTB 1 +#endif mcr p15, 0, ip, c2, c0, 2 @ TTB control register mcr p15, 0, r10, c1, c0, 1 @ Auxiliary control register mcr p15, 0, r11, c1, c0, 2 @ Co-processor access controlDo we really need all this ifdef else throughout this series? I think we already have things in place to do this dynamically like we already do for thumb, smp_on_up, v6 vs v7 and so on.
By dynamically, do you mean at run-time? We won't be able to compile both classic and LPAE in the same kernel, there is just too much difference between them (2 vs 3 levels of page tables - LPAE is an entirely new format). If you mean some simpler macros like what we have for ARM/THUMB to reduce the number of lines, I'm fine with it though we don't always have a 1:1 mapping between LPAE and non-LPAE instructions. Alternatively, I'm happy to create a separate proc-v7lpae.S file. -- Catalin