So I deduce, that your HW has no way to mark the wakeup
interrupts. Whack your HW designer on my behalf, please! :)

Patch below against:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git irq/core

It's 8 lines, but that's still at least an order of magnitude less
than solving this with an workaround. :)

Thanks,

	tglx

---------->
Subject: genirq-force-mask-on-suspend.patch
From: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:22:14 +0100

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
---
 include/linux/irq.h |    2 ++
 kernel/irq/pm.c     |   14 ++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/irq.h
===================================================================

--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/include/linux/irq.h
+++ linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/irq.h

@@ -330,10 +330,12 @@ struct irq_chip {
  *
  * IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED:	Mask before calling chip.irq_set_type()
  * IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED:	Only issue irq_eoi() when irq was handled
+ * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND:	Mask non wake irqs in the suspend path
  */
 enum {
 	IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED		= (1 <<  0),
 	IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED		= (1 <<  1),
+	IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND		= (2 <<  1),
 };
 
 /* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */

Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/pm.c
===================================================================

--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/pm.c

@@ -68,10 +68,16 @@ int check_wakeup_irqs(void)
 	struct irq_desc *desc;
 	int irq;
 
-	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc)
-		if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data) &&
-		    (desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING))
-			return -EBUSY;
+	for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
+		if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
+			if (desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING)
+				return -EBUSY;
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED &&
+		    irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
+			mask_irq(desc);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }