Thread (102 messages) 102 messages, 6 authors, 2011-03-01

Lifecycle

  1. Posted viresh.linux@gmail.com (viresh kumar)

[PATCH V5 30/63] ST SPEAr: Replacing SIZE macro's with actual required size

From: viresh kumar <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-21 13:57:17

On 2/21/11, Russell King - ARM Linux [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:34:20PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
quoted
On 02/21/2011 05:23 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
So sending only first 10 patches looks a bit insufficient to me? Would be
better
to send all of them (leaving what you have already applied), so that they
apply cleanly at your end.
I don't know, and I'm getting to the point of giving up with this SPEAr
stuff.  It's more trouble and time consuming than it's worth because of
the size of the patch set.  It's just *too* large to properly deal with.
Please don't do that now. I agree that it was too big to get reviewed
and get added.
I will make it sure, that it doesn't happen again from our side. But
now lots of effort
has already been put on it, by everybody in reviewing and preparing them.

Let me check, might be only few patches are required to be resent and
others will
automatically apply over them.

--
viresh
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help