[PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: IOMMU: change OMAP2+ error message to dev_dbg()
From: David Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-15 13:44:27
Also in:
linux-omap
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello.
Hi,
On 15-02-2011 16:20, David Cohen wrote:quoted
IOMMU upper layer is already printing error message. OMAP2+ specific layer may print error message only for debug purpose.quoted
Signed-off-by: David Cohen<redacted> --- ?arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c | ? ?6 +++--- ?1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c index 14ee686..4244a07 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c@@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ static u32 omap2_iommu_fault_isr(struct iommu *obj,u32 *ra) ? ? ? ?da = iommu_read_reg(obj, MMU_FAULT_AD); ? ? ? ?*ra = da; - ? ? ? dev_err(obj->dev, "%s:\tda:%08x ", __func__, da); + ? ? ? dev_dbg(obj->dev, "%s:\tda:%08x ", __func__, da);? Note that dev_dbg() will only print something if either DEBUG or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are defined...
That's my plan.
quoted
? ? ? ?for (i = 0; i< ?ARRAY_SIZE(err_msg); i++) { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (stat & (1<< ?i)) - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? printk("%s ", err_msg[i]); + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s ", err_msg[i]);? ... unlike printk(KERN_DEBUG...). You probably want to use pr_debug() instead.quoted
? ? ? ?} - ? ? ? printk("\n"); + ? ? ? printk(KERN_DEBUG "\n");? Here too... Although wait, it should be KERN_CONT instead! Debug levels are only attributed to the whole lines.
But your observation is correct. I'll resend it with KERN_CONT instead. Regards, David
WBR, Sergei