Thread (17 messages) flat view 17 messages, 4 authors, 2011-02-15
STALE5676d

[PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: IOMMU: change OMAP2+ error message to dev_dbg()

From: David Cohen <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-15 13:44:27
Also in: linux-omap

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Sergei Shtylyov [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello.
Hi,
On 15-02-2011 16:20, David Cohen wrote:
quoted
IOMMU upper layer is already printing error message. OMAP2+ specific
layer may print error message only for debug purpose.
quoted
Signed-off-by: David Cohen<redacted>
---
?arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c | ? ?6 +++---
?1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c
index 14ee686..4244a07 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/iommu2.c
@@ -163,13 +163,13 @@ static u32 omap2_iommu_fault_isr(struct iommu *obj,
u32 *ra)
? ? ? ?da = iommu_read_reg(obj, MMU_FAULT_AD);
? ? ? ?*ra = da;

- ? ? ? dev_err(obj->dev, "%s:\tda:%08x ", __func__, da);
+ ? ? ? dev_dbg(obj->dev, "%s:\tda:%08x ", __func__, da);
? Note that dev_dbg() will only print something if either DEBUG or
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG are defined...
That's my plan.
quoted
? ? ? ?for (i = 0; i< ?ARRAY_SIZE(err_msg); i++) {
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?if (stat & (1<< ?i))
- ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? printk("%s ", err_msg[i]);
+ ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s ", err_msg[i]);
? ... unlike printk(KERN_DEBUG...). You probably want to use pr_debug()
instead.
quoted
? ? ? ?}
- ? ? ? printk("\n");
+ ? ? ? printk(KERN_DEBUG "\n");
? Here too... Although wait, it should be KERN_CONT instead! Debug levels
are only attributed to the whole lines.
But your observation is correct. I'll resend it with KERN_CONT instead.

Regards,

David
WBR, Sergei
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help