[PATCH v3 1/2] PRUSS UIO driver support
From: TK, Pratheesh Gangadhar <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-24 13:55:26
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx at linutronix.de] Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 1:56 AM To: TK, Pratheesh Gangadhar Cc: davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com; hjk at hansjkoch.de; gregkh at suse.de; Chatterjee, Amit; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- kernel at lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] PRUSS UIO driver support On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Pratheesh Gangadhar wrote: Is it actually too much of an hassle to cc the people who spent their time to review previous versions of your patch ?
Sorry. Will do...
quoted
+struct clk *pruss_clk; +struct uio_info *info; +void *ddr_virt_addr = NULL, *prussio_virt_addr = NULL;Grrr. We do not initialize with NULL.quoted
+dma_addr_t ddr_phy_addr;Also all of these want to be static.
Ok.
quoted
+ uio_unregister_device(p); + kfree(p->name); + } + iounmap(prussio_virt_addr); + dma_free_coherent(&dev->dev, info[0].mem[2].size, + info[0].mem[2].internal_addr, info[0].mem[2].addr);You sure, that iounmap and dma_free_coherent are too happy about being called with NULL pointers?
For iounmap its ok, not ok for dma_free_coherent. Will fix.
quoted
+ + kfree(info); + clk_put(pruss_clk); +} + +static int __devinit pruss_probe(struct platform_device *dev) +{ + int ret = -ENODEV, count = 0; + struct resource *regs_prussio, *regs_l3ram, *regs_ddr; + struct uio_info *p; + + info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct uio_info) * MAX_PRUSS_EVTOUT_INSTANCE, + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!info) + return -ENOMEM; + + /* Power on PRU in case its not done as part of boot-loader */ + pruss_clk = clk_get(&dev->dev, "pruss"); + if (IS_ERR(pruss_clk)) { + dev_err(&dev->dev, "Failed to get clock\n"); + ret = PTR_ERR(pruss_clk); + return ret;Memory leak.
Will fix. Thanks, Pratheesh