[PATCH] ARM: pxa: support 806MHz operating points for PXA31x processors A2 stepping
From: Igor Grinberg <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-15 16:58:12
Also in:
lkml
Hi, On 02/15/11 18:20, Axel Lin wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
PXA3xx Specification Update document states that the 806MHz operating points were added for PXA31x processors A2 stepping. This patch adds 806MHz operating points support for PXA31x A2 stepping. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <redacted> --- I cannot find any details for PXA31x stepping B1 and B2, thus I made this patch for PXA31x stepping A2 only. Axel arch/arm/mach-pxa/cpufreq-pxa3xx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cpufreq-pxa3xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cpufreq-pxa3xx.c index 88fbec0..f4f0c2e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cpufreq-pxa3xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/cpufreq-pxa3xx.c@@ -210,15 +210,30 @@ static int pxa3xx_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) /* set default policy and cpuinfo */ policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 104000; - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = (cpu_is_pxa320()) ? 806000 : 624000; + + if (cpu_is_pxa300()) + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 624000; + else if (cpu_is_pxa310()) + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = ((read_cpuid_id() & 0xf) == 0x2) ? + 806000 : 624000; + else if (cpu_is_pxa320()) + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 806000; + policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000; /* FIXME: 1 ms, assumed */ policy->max = pxa3xx_get_clk_frequency_khz(0); policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max; - if (cpu_is_pxa300() || cpu_is_pxa310()) + if (cpu_is_pxa300()) ret = setup_freqs_table(policy, ARRAY_AND_SIZE(pxa300_freqs)); - - if (cpu_is_pxa320()) + else if (cpu_is_pxa310()) + /* PXA310 A2 STEPPING supports 806Mhz operating points */ + if ((read_cpuid_id() & 0xf) == 0x2) + ret = setup_freqs_table(policy, + ARRAY_AND_SIZE(pxa320_freqs)); + else + ret = setup_freqs_table(policy, + ARRAY_AND_SIZE(pxa300_freqs)); + else if (cpu_is_pxa320()) ret = setup_freqs_table(policy, ARRAY_AND_SIZE(pxa320_freqs)); if (ret) {
Yeah, I've proposed something like that about half a year ago: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg92899.html Eric was not so happy about it back then, may be this time? Eric, what do you think? Also, there is one thing that is not related to this patch, but if you have the hardware, you need to be concerned with, is that the vcc_core voltage has to be 1.4V, otherwise your hardware will be unstable. -- Regards, Igor.