[RFC,PATCH 2/3] clk: Generic support for fixed-rate clocks

On 02/14/2011 05:41 PM, Jeremy Kerr wrote:

Hi Ryan,

quoted

A fixed clock may still have other operations such as enable/disable.

Then it's not a fixed clock; I'd prefer this to be a separate type, as it's
now hardware dependent.

I'm confused. If a clock's rate can't be changed and it can't be enabled 
or disabled, then what's the point of representing that clock 
signal/line as a clock in the driver. Seems like a "nothing to see here, 
move along" type of clock. To express it differently, I find this 
similar to "if (1) { ... }". Obviously I'm missing something here. What 
is it?

-Saravana

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.