Thread (128 messages) read the whole thread 128 messages, 19 authors, 2011-04-20

Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <hidden>
Date: 2011-02-01 15:26:21
Also in: linux-sh, lkml

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:18:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
yeah, didn't thought about multiple consumers, so (as Jeremy suggested)
the right thing is to sleep until CLK_BUSY is cleared.
A simpler way to write this is:

int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
{
	int ret = 0;

	mutex_lock(&clk->mutex);
	if (clk->prepared == 0)
		ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk);
	if (ret == 0)
		clk->prepared++;
	mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex);

	return ret;
}

I think we want to take a common mutex not only for clk_prepare(), but
also for clk_set_rate().  If prepare() is waiting for a PLL to lock,
we don't want a set_rate() interfering with that.

I'd also be tempted at this stage to build-in a no-op dummy clock,
that being the NULL clk:

int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
{
	int ret = 0;

	if (clk) {
		mutex_lock(&clk->mutex);
		if (clk->prepared == 0)
			ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk);
		if (ret == 0)
			clk->prepared++;
		mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex);
	}

	return ret;
}

as we have various platforms defining a dummy struct clk as a way of
satisfying various driver requirements.  These dummy clocks are exactly
that - they're complete no-ops.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help