On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Usually even "shitty git trees" have value in the history for people
who're interested why the code is the way it is. But as people who
actually looked at the patches, it doesn't apply here.

Thomas posted how the android tree commits looks. ?How about getting a
clue before posting more useless noise in this thread?

Oh, don't you even try to "pull a Christoph" on me! I did see Thomas'
and Russell's comments about the quality of the tree which is why I
said "it doesn't apply here" (that the history is useless).