Hi Dima!

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Dima Zavin [off-list ref] wrote:

There's absolutely no hostility. I stated from the very beginning that
I appreciate the voluntary effort by a 3rd party to upstream the board
files. I only asked that proper authorship be attributed, which is
standard linux kernel patch submission procedure when the committer
did not originate the code.

OK, that's great! It's poorly reflected in this discussion thread, though.

quoted

who have been sitting on these patches for over a year now AFAICT.

Even if that were true, that does not somehow revoke the original
author/contributor list.

No, it does not. But it does make me much more sympathetic towards
Daniel's efforts even though authorship info is misappropriated. It's
not as if he changed copyrights or anything malicious like that so I
do think people are making this into a bigger thing than it really is.

Anyway, I hope Daniel has the time to rebase his patches on top of
your original ones so history is preserved and we can get this stuff
merged.

                       Pekka