[PATCH 2/3] perf: add OMAP support for the new power events
From: Jean Pihet <hidden>
Date: 2011-01-05 11:05:20
Also in:
linux-omap, linux-perf-users, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2011-01-11 · Re: [PATCH 2/3] perf: add OMAP support for the new power events · Kevin Hilman <hidden>
Hi Paul, On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Paul Walmsley [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Jean, On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, jean.pihet at newoldbits.com wrote:quoted
From: Jean Pihet <redacted> The patch adds the new power management trace points for the OMAP architecture. The trace points are for: - default idle handler. Since the cpuidle framework is ? instrumented in the generic way there is no need to ? add trace points in the OMAP specific cpuidle handler; - cpufreq (DVFS), - clocks changes (enable, disable, set_rate),A question about these. ?Are these only meant to track calls to these functions from outside the clock code? ?Or meant to track actual hardware clock changes?
The former: this is used to track the clock requests from outside the clock framework.
If the latter, then it might make sense to put these
trace points into the functions that actually change the hardware
registers, e.g., omap2_dflt_clk_{enable,disable}(), etc., since a
clk_enable() on a leaf clock may result in many internal system clocks
being enabled up the clock tree.I agree with you it is better to track the actual clock changes instead.
I propose to move the tracepoints to omap2_clk_{enable...} which
enables all the clocks irrespectively of the installed handler.
Note about the clock handlers: omap2_dflt_clk_enable happens to be the
handler for all controllable clocks but could that change in the
future?
- Paul
Thanks, Jean
quoted
- change of power domains next power states. Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <redacted> --- ?arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c ? ? ?| ? ?7 +++++++ ?arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | ? ?3 +++ ?arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c ? ? ? ?| ? 13 ++++++++++--- ?3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c index 0ec8a04..0ee0b0e 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@?#include <linux/delay.h> ?#include <linux/slab.h> ?#include <linux/console.h> +#include <trace/events/power.h> ?#include <plat/sram.h> ?#include <plat/clockdomain.h>@@ -506,8 +507,14 @@ static void omap3_pm_idle(void)? ? ? if (omap_irq_pending() || need_resched()) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto out; + ? ? trace_power_start(POWER_CSTATE, 1, smp_processor_id()); + ? ? trace_cpu_idle(1, smp_processor_id()); + ? ? ? omap_sram_idle(); + ? ? trace_power_end(smp_processor_id()); + ? ? trace_cpu_idle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id()); + ?out: ? ? ? local_fiq_enable(); ? ? ? local_irq_enable();diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c index 6527ec3..73cbe9a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@?#include <linux/errno.h> ?#include <linux/err.h> ?#include <linux/io.h> +#include <trace/events/power.h> ?#include <asm/atomic.h>@@ -440,6 +441,8 @@ int pwrdm_set_next_pwrst(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, u8 pwrst)? ? ? pr_debug("powerdomain: setting next powerstate for %s to %0x\n", ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pwrdm->name, pwrst); + ? ? trace_power_domain_target(pwrdm->name, pwrst, smp_processor_id()); + ? ? ? prm_rmw_mod_reg_bits(OMAP_POWERSTATE_MASK, ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?(pwrst << OMAP_POWERSTATE_SHIFT), ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?pwrdm->prcm_offs, pwrstctrl_reg_offs);diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c index fc62fb5..7cbb09b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/clock.c@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@?#include <linux/cpufreq.h> ?#include <linux/debugfs.h> ?#include <linux/io.h> +#include <trace/events/power.h> ?#include <plat/clock.h>@@ -43,8 +44,10 @@ int clk_enable(struct clk *clk)? ? ? ? ? ? ? return -EINVAL; ? ? ? spin_lock_irqsave(&clockfw_lock, flags); - ? ? if (arch_clock->clk_enable) + ? ? if (arch_clock->clk_enable) { + ? ? ? ? ? ? trace_clock_enable(clk->name, 1, smp_processor_id()); ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = arch_clock->clk_enable(clk); + ? ? } ? ? ? spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockfw_lock, flags); ? ? ? return ret;@@ -66,8 +69,10 @@ void clk_disable(struct clk *clk)? ? ? ? ? ? ? goto out; ? ? ? } - ? ? if (arch_clock->clk_disable) + ? ? if (arch_clock->clk_disable) { + ? ? ? ? ? ? trace_clock_disable(clk->name, 0, smp_processor_id()); ? ? ? ? ? ? ? arch_clock->clk_disable(clk); + ? ? } ?out: ? ? ? spin_unlock_irqrestore(&clockfw_lock, flags);@@ -120,8 +125,10 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)? ? ? ? ? ? ? return ret; ? ? ? spin_lock_irqsave(&clockfw_lock, flags); - ? ? if (arch_clock->clk_set_rate) + ? ? if (arch_clock->clk_set_rate) { + ? ? ? ? ? ? trace_clock_set_rate(clk->name, rate, smp_processor_id()); ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ret = arch_clock->clk_set_rate(clk, rate); + ? ? } ? ? ? if (ret == 0) { ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (clk->recalc) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? clk->rate = clk->recalc(clk); -- 1.7.2.3- Paul