Thread (146 messages) flat view 146 messages, 7 authors, 2010-12-10
STALE5759d

[PATCH 03/15] ARM: mxs: Add reset routines

From: Lothar Waßmann <hidden>
Date: 2010-11-26 14:38:59

Hi,

Xinyu Chen writes:
Hi Lothar

2010/11/26 Lothar Wa?mann [off-list ref]:
quoted
If you consider this a problem:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at /usr/local/src/arm-linux/kernel/mutex.c:
280
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper
2 locks held by swapper/0:
?#0: ?(&port_lock_key){-.-...}, at: [<c01aed10>] imx_rxint+0x24/0x20c
?#1: ?(sysrq_key_table_lock){-.....}, at: [<c01a8e14>] __handle_sysrq+0x20/0x170
irq event stamp: 130658
hardirqs last ?enabled at (130657): [<c0027f80>] default_idle+0x2c/0x3c
hardirqs last disabled at (130658): [<c0026a74>] __irq_svc+0x34/0xa8
softirqs last ?enabled at (130648): [<c004bc1c>] __do_softirq+0x144/0x164
softirqs last disabled at (130637): [<c004bc9c>] irq_exit+0x60/0xb4
Backtrace:
[<c002aee0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x114) from [<c0260240>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
?r7:00000000 r6:c0326000 r5:00000000 r4:c0326000
[<c0260228>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c0041930>] (__might_sleep+0x11c/0x13c)
[<c0041814>] (__might_sleep+0x0/0x13c) from [<c026181c>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x34/0x31c)
?r4:c032afd4
[<c02617e8>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x0/0x31c) from [<c003097c>] (clk_get_sys+0x30/0xe8)
[<c003094c>] (clk_get_sys+0x0/0xe8) from [<c00338c8>] (arch_reset+0x18/0x8c)
[<c00338b0>] (arch_reset+0x0/0x8c) from [<c0028564>] (arm_machine_restart+0x2c/0x5c)
?r5:00000000 r4:00000068
[<c0028538>] (arm_machine_restart+0x0/0x5c) from [<c0027f3c>] (machine_restart+0x20/0x28)
?r5:d186b9c0 r4:00000062
[<c0027f1c>] (machine_restart+0x0/0x28) from [<c0056db8>] (emergency_restart+0x14/0x18)
[<c0056da4>] (emergency_restart+0x0/0x18) from [<c01a9220>] (sysrq_handle_reboot+0x24/0x28)
[<c01a91fc>] (sysrq_handle_reboot+0x0/0x28) from [<c01a8eb4>] (__handle_sysrq+0xc0/0x170)
[<c01a8df4>] (__handle_sysrq+0x0/0x170) from [<c01a8fd4>] (handle_sysrq+0x34/0x40)
[<c01a8fa0>] (handle_sysrq+0x0/0x40) from [<c01aedd8>] (imx_rxint+0xec/0x20c)
[<c01aecec>] (imx_rxint+0x0/0x20c) from [<c01aef20>] (imx_int+0x28/0x68)
[<c01aeef8>] (imx_int+0x0/0x68) from [<c007a794>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x2c/0x100)
?r7:0000002d r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:d1eab800
[<c007a768>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x0/0x100) from [<c007c4fc>] (handle_level_irq+0xbc/0x120)
?r7:d1eab800 r6:c03340b8 r5:0000002d r4:c033407c
[<c007c440>] (handle_level_irq+0x0/0x120) from [<c0026070>] (_text+0x70/0x8c)
?r7:00000002 r6:002d0000 r5:00000000 r4:0000002d
[<c0026000>] (_text+0x0/0x8c) from [<c0026a94>] (__irq_svc+0x54/0xa8)
Exception stack(0xc0327f48 to 0xc0327f90)
7f40: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 00000001 0016e240 20000093 20000013 c0326000 c032aaa8
7f60: c03541e4 c032aaa0 8001ecc4 41069264 8001ec90 c0327f9c c0327f68 c0327f90
7f80: c006c620 c0027f8c 20000013 ffffffff
?r5:fc400000 r4:0000001f
[<c0027f54>] (default_idle+0x0/0x3c) from [<c00284dc>] (cpu_idle+0x70/0xcc)
[<c002846c>] (cpu_idle+0x0/0xcc) from [<c025d338>] (rest_init+0x70/0x84)
?r7:c032aaa0 r6:c0020e14 r5:c0020e18 r4:c0853ad8
[<c025d2c8>] (rest_init+0x0/0x84) from [<c00089a4>] (start_kernel+0x280/0x2d8)
[<c0008724>] (start_kernel+0x0/0x2d8) from [<80008034>] (0x80008034)
?r5:c0354284 r4:00053175
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at /usr/local/src/arm-linux/kernel/mutex.c:207 mutex_lock_nested+0xb4/0x31c()
Modules linked in:
Backtrace:
[<c002aee0>] (dump_backtrace+0x0/0x114) from [<c0260240>] (dump_stack+0x18/0x1c)
?r7:c02e09d3 r6:000000cf r5:c026189c r4:00000000
[<c0260228>] (dump_stack+0x0/0x1c) from [<c004682c>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x50/0x68)
[<c00467dc>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x0/0x68) from [<c004685c>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1c)
?r7:00000000 r6:c0326000 r5:c0329868 r4:c032afd4
[<c0046844>] (warn_slowpath_null+0x0/0x1c) from [<c026189c>] (mutex_lock_nested+0xb4/0x31c)
[<c02617e8>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x0/0x31c) from [<c003097c>] (clk_get_sys+0x30/0xe8)
[<c003094c>] (clk_get_sys+0x0/0xe8) from [<c00338c8>] (arch_reset+0x18/0x8c)
[<c00338b0>] (arch_reset+0x0/0x8c) from [<c0028564>] (arm_machine_restart+0x2c/0x5c)
?r5:00000000 r4:00000068
[<c0028538>] (arm_machine_restart+0x0/0x5c) from [<c0027f3c>] (machine_restart+0x20/0x28)
?r5:d186b9c0 r4:00000062
[<c0027f1c>] (machine_restart+0x0/0x28) from [<c0056db8>] (emergency_restart+0x14/0x18)
[<c0056da4>] (emergency_restart+0x0/0x18) from [<c01a9220>] (sysrq_handle_reboot+0x24/0x28)
[<c01a91fc>] (sysrq_handle_reboot+0x0/0x28) from [<c01a8eb4>] (__handle_sysrq+0xc0/0x170)
[<c01a8df4>] (__handle_sysrq+0x0/0x170) from [<c01a8fd4>] (handle_sysrq+0x34/0x40)
[<c01a8fa0>] (handle_sysrq+0x0/0x40) from [<c01aedd8>] (imx_rxint+0xec/0x20c)
[<c01aecec>] (imx_rxint+0x0/0x20c) from [<c01aef20>] (imx_int+0x28/0x68)
[<c01aeef8>] (imx_int+0x0/0x68) from [<c007a794>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x2c/0x100)
?r7:0000002d r6:00000000 r5:00000000 r4:d1eab800
[<c007a768>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x0/0x100) from [<c007c4fc>] (handle_level_irq+0xbc/0x120)
?r7:d1eab800 r6:c03340b8 r5:0000002d r4:c033407c
[<c007c440>] (handle_level_irq+0x0/0x120) from [<c0026070>] (_text+0x70/0x8c)
?r7:00000002 r6:002d0000 r5:00000000 r4:0000002d
[<c0026000>] (_text+0x0/0x8c) from [<c0026a94>] (__irq_svc+0x54/0xa8)
Exception stack(0xc0327f48 to 0xc0327f90)
7f40: ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 00000001 0016e240 20000093 20000013 c0326000 c032aaa8
7f60: c03541e4 c032aaa0 8001ecc4 41069264 8001ec90 c0327f9c c0327f68 c0327f90
7f80: c006c620 c0027f8c 20000013 ffffffff
?r5:fc400000 r4:0000001f
[<c0027f54>] (default_idle+0x0/0x3c) from [<c00284dc>] (cpu_idle+0x70/0xcc)
[<c002846c>] (cpu_idle+0x0/0xcc) from [<c025d338>] (rest_init+0x70/0x84)
?r7:c032aaa0 r6:c0020e14 r5:c0020e18 r4:c0853ad8
[<c025d2c8>] (rest_init+0x0/0x84) from [<c00089a4>] (start_kernel+0x280/0x2d8)
[<c0008724>] (start_kernel+0x0/0x2d8) from [<80008034>] (0x80008034)
?r5:c0354284 r4:00053175
---[ end trace b484fc13651ee6f1 ]---
could we use spin_lock but not mutex_lock in the clk_enable/disable?
I'm considering there may have drivers call clk enable/disable in the
irq context to done feature or save power.
This has already been discussed in June this year and rejected:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2010-June/017758.html

Anyway the offending code in this case is the clk_get_sys() function.


Lothar Wa?mann
-- 
___________________________________________________________

Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstra?e 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996

www.karo-electronics.de | info at karo-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help