[PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: Samsung: Add register definitions for Samsung S5P SoC camera interface

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Kukjin Kim [off-list ref] wrote:

Russell King wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:08:42PM +0200, Pawel Osciak wrote:

quoted

quoted

Russell King - ARM Linux [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 12:32:20PM +0200, Pawel Osciak wrote:

quoted

Well, some of them are indeed unused, but it's not an uncommon

practice in

quoted

quoted

quoted

quoted

kernel and might help future developers.

On the other hand, arch/arm is getting soo big that we need to do
something about this - and one solution is to avoid unnecessary
definitions that we're not using.

Another good idea is to put definitions along side the drivers which
they're relevant to - maybe in a local driver-name.h file which
driver-name.c includes, or maybe even within driver-name.c if they're
not excessive. ?This has the advantage of distributing the "bloat" to
where its actually used, and means that the driver isn't dependent so
much on arch/arm or even the SoC itself.

Take a look at arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/ct-ca9x4.h and
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/include/mach/motherboard.h - these are the only
two files which contain platform definitions which are actually used
for Versatile Express. ?Compare that with
arch/arm/mach-realview/include/mach/platform.h which contains lots
more...

So basically, what you and Mauro are recommending is that we move the

*.h

quoted

quoted

file with register definitions to drivers/media?

What I'm suggesting is what's been pretty standard in Linux for a long
time. ?Take a look at: drivers/net/3c503.[ch], or for a more recent
driver, drivers/net/e1000/*.[ch]. ?Or drivers/mmc/host/mmci.[ch]

I agree with Russell's opinion.
I don't want to add unnecessary(or unavailable in arch/arm) definitions in
arch/arm/*/include

quoted

Putting definitions which are only used by one driver in

arch/arm/*/include

quoted

is silly.

I also happy with this method.

Thank you,
Kyungmin Park