[PATCH 2/5] Treo680: remove unused LCD power GPIO

Hi,

Dne ?t 1. z??? 2009 11:49:24 Eric Miao napsal(a):

Tom?? 'Sleep_Walker' ?ech wrote:

quoted

Hi,

Dne Po 31. srpna 2009 19:34:51 Marek Vasut napsal(a):

quoted

Dne Po 31. srpna 2009 19:25:58 Tom?? ?ech napsal(a):

quoted

From: Tom?? ?ech <sleep walker@suse.cz>


Signed-off-by: Tom?? ?ech <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/treo680.c |   10 +---------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/treo680.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/treo680.c
index 050ad8e..57bccc3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/treo680.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/treo680.c

@@ -254,16 +254,9 @@ static int treo680_backlight_init(struct device *dev)
 	ret = gpio_direction_output(GPIO_NR_TREO680_BL_POWER, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err2;
-	ret = gpio_request(GPIO_NR_TREO680_LCD_POWER, "LCD POWER");
-	if (ret)
-		goto err2;
-	ret = gpio_direction_output(GPIO_NR_TREO680_LCD_POWER, 0);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err3;

 	return 0;
-err3:
-	gpio_free(GPIO_NR_TREO680_LCD_POWER);
+
 err2:
 	gpio_free(GPIO_NR_TREO680_BL_POWER);
 err:

@@ -279,7 +272,6 @@ static int treo680_backlight_notify(int brightness)
 static void treo680_backlight_exit(struct device *dev)
 {
 	gpio_free(GPIO_NR_TREO680_BL_POWER);
-	gpio_free(GPIO_NR_TREO680_LCD_POWER);
 }

 static struct platform_pwm_backlight_data treo680_backlight_data = {

Why was that GPIO there before then? Does this have any effect on the boot 
problems you are experiencing with Centro/T680? Otherwise seems OK to me

I used it first in brightness setting for 0 value. I found it not good idea. I removed it from function, but I wanted to keep GPIO registered and direction set. But it can work well even without that and I'd like to add some function to export some control GPIOs through /sys/class/gpio interface (bluetooth power, GSM power, GSM reset...) - this GPIO will be also exported there...

The name sounds like a GPIO for the power of the LCD panel itself,
does it make sense to have this somewhere in the LCD power_{on,off}
hooks?

Yes, it would be much better.
I was looking for the right place - did you mean pxafb_mach_info.pxafb_lcd_power?

Thanks

Best regards,

Tomas Cech