Re: [PATCH 13/20] signal: Implement force_fatal_sig
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-21 16:24:27
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:43:59PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Add a simple helper force_fatal_sig that causes a signal to be delivered to a process as if the signal handler was set to SIG_DFL. Reimplement force_sigsegv based upon this new helper. This fixes force_sigsegv so that when it forces the default signal handler to be used the code now forces the signal to be unblocked as well. Reusing the tested logic in force_sig_info_to_task that was built for force_sig_seccomp this makes the implementation trivial. This is interesting both because it makes force_sigsegv simpler and because there are a couple of buggy places in the kernel that call do_exit(SIGILL) or do_exit(SIGSYS) because there is no straight forward way today for those places to simply force the exit of a process with the chosen signal. Creating force_fatal_sig allows those places to be implemented with normal signal exits.
I assume this is talking about seccomp()? :) Should a patch be included in this series to change those?
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <redacted> -- Kees Cook