Re: [PATCH 13/20] signal: Implement force_fatal_sig
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2021-10-20 20:05:44
Also in:
lkml
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2021-10-20 20:05:44
Also in:
lkml
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 7:45 AM Eric W. Biederman [off-list ref] wrote:
Add a simple helper force_fatal_sig that causes a signal to be delivered to a process as if the signal handler was set to SIG_DFL. Reimplement force_sigsegv based upon this new helper.
Can you just make the old force_sigsegv() go away? The odd special
casing of SIGSEGV was odd to begin with, I think everybody really just
wanted this new "force_fatal_sig()" and allow any signal - not making
SIGSEGV special.
Also, I think it should set SIGKILL in p->pending.signal or something
like that - because we want this to trigger fatal_signal_pending(),
don't we?
Right now fatal_signal_pending() is only true for SIGKILL, I think.
Linus