Re: [PATCH] signal/m68k: Use force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) in fpsp040_die
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-08-26 12:15:14
Also in:
linux-m68k
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 11:08 PM Eric W. Biederman [off-list ref] wrote:
In the fpsp040 code when copyin or copyout fails call
force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) instead of do_exit(SIGSEGV).
This solves a couple of problems. Because do_exit embeds the ptrace
stop PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT a complete stack frame needs to be present for
that to work correctly. There is always the information needed for a
ptrace stop where get_signal is called. So exiting with a signal
solves the ptrace issue.
Further exiting with a signal ensures that all of the threads in a
process are killed not just the thread that malfunctioned. Which
avoids confusing userspace.
To make force_sigsegv(SIGSEGV) work in fpsp040_die modify the code to
save all of the registers and jump to ret_from_exception (which
ultimately calls get_signal) after fpsp040_die returns.
v2: Updated the branches to use gas's pseudo ops that automatically
calculate the best branch instruction to use for the purpose.
v1: Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87a6m8kgtx.fsf_-_@disp2133
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <redacted>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds