Thread (26 messages) 26 messages, 10 authors, 2021-07-29

Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] arch: Introduce ARCH_HAS_HW_XCHG_SMALL

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2021-07-24 19:24:31

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 2:36 PM Huacai Chen [off-list ref] wrote:
Introduce a new Kconfig option ARCH_HAS_HW_XCHG_SMALL, which means arch
has hardware sub-word xchg/cmpxchg support. This option will be used as
an indicator to select the bit-field definition in the qspinlock data
structure.

Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <redacted>
Adding a Kconfig conditional sounds like a good idea, but I have two
concerns about the specific implementation:

- I think we should have separate symbols for 8-bit, 16-bit and 64-bit
  cmpxchg(). I think every architecture needs to support at least 32-bit
  cmpxchg() and 64-bit architectures also need to support cmpxchg64().
  I actually have a prototype patch that introduces cmpxchg8() and
  cmpxchg16() helpers with the purpose of no longer supporting these
  width in the normal cmpxchg(), but that is mostly independent of
  whether we want a conditional or not.

- If I remember correctly, there were some concerns about whether using
  this information for picking the qspinlock implementation is a good idea.

         Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help