Thread (56 messages) 56 messages, 12 authors, 2021-06-09

RE: [PATCH RFC 0/3] riscv: Add DMA_COHERENT support

From: David Laight <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-08 15:00:25
Also in: linux-riscv, linux-sunxi, lkml

From: Christoph Hellwig
Sent: 07 June 2021 07:27

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 11:19:03AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
quoted
quoted
From Linux non-coherency view, we need:
 - Non-cache + Strong Order PTE attributes to deal with drivers' DMA descriptors
 - Non-cache + weak order to deal with framebuffer drivers
 - CMO dma_sync to sync cache with DMA devices
This is not strictly true.  At the very minimum you only need cache
invalidation and writeback instructions.  For example early parisc
CPUs and some m68knommu SOCs have no support for uncached areas at all,
and Linux works.  But to be fair this is very painful and supports only
very limited periphals.  So for modern full Linux support some uncahed
memory is advisable.  But that doesn't have to be using PTE attributes.
It could also be physical memory regions that are either totally fixed
or somewhat dynamic.
It is almost impossible to interface to many ethernet chips without
either coherent or uncached memory for the descriptor rings.
The status bits on the transmit ring are particularly problematic.

The receive ring can be done with writeback+invalidate provided you
fill a cache line at a time.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help